9 measures against extremism

13 Mar 2024

Right-wing extremism has become dangerous; it is jeopardising democracy in the USA and France and is also becoming a threat in other countries. And the democratic parties are arguing about what to do about it. I claim to present the solution to the problem here - 9 tips that really help...Read more about 7 measures against extremism

Democratic parties are used to competing with other democratic parties. They do not yet have much experience of competing with extremist parties. But extremism has become dangerous, especially right-wing extremism. It is jeopardising democracy in the USA and France and is also becoming a threat in other countries. This development concerns me. It can lead to disasters (see Deal with disasters).

I claim to present here 9 measures that really help. They do not really offer a solution to the problem. For this would require equalising the inequality between rich and poor, overcoming the pursuit of material wealth and power, replacing envy and hatred with empathy and love... I am concerned here with measures that have a chance of being realised, measures that can save democracies. It's urgent! I start with refugee policy, the most discussed topic:


1

Promote integration

The asylum procedure should be as unbureaucratic as possible and the responsible authorities should be well staffed so that the asylum procedure runs as quickly as possible. Afterwards, the recognized and tolerated asylum seekers should soon get a job, initially a small, obligatory community service, but soon the regular labour market should also be available to them. Wherever possible, locals and refugees should work together, and part of the work should consist of language learning. The neighbourhoods should have diverse residents and the schools should have children of different ethnicities.

2

Promote a welcoming culture

It is wrong to claim that the municipalities or any authorities are overburdened by the refugees. If they wanted to, all industrialised nations could take in many more refugees. The basic attitude in the democratic parties should be that we are happy to help people in need.

3

Take the issues away from the extremist parties

By this I do not mean that we should adopt the agitation against foreigners. On the contrary, let's promote a welcoming culture, encounters with refugees, let's spread their stories! At the same time, it is important to take the mood of the locals into account. If a large proportion of locals are against generous help for refugees, politicians must take appropriate measures within the framework of laws and agreements, i.e. tighten up asylum laws. And they must justify these measures with the mood among the locals and at the same time emphasise that they actually like to help the refugees. In other words, take the issues away from the far-right parties with deeds, not with words!

4

Don't exaggerate criticism

"We need good policies that convince people" - this demand helps the extrtemistic parties and harms the democratic parties. Because it is the statement behind this sentence: "The government is making bad policies that do not convince the people." It is often an assertion made by the opposition; they exaggerate their criticism of the government in the hope that they will be able to absorb people's dissatisfaction. But exaggerations also have the effect of making people feel reinforced in their dissatisfaction. Please leave the exaggerations to the extremist parties!

I agree that the political and economic system in democracies also needs improvement (less influence of the business lobby on politics and society, social equalisation, climate and environmental protection). But extremist parties only make these problems worse!

5

Distancing yourself from extremism

It is time to stand up and warn of the dangers of right-wing extremism! The demonstrations against right-wing extremism in Germany in early 2024 caused the far-right AfD to lose several percentage points of support. Politicians should not co-operate with extremists wherever possible. It is also always a good idea to distance yourself from extremism in conversations, events, websites and social media when the opportunity arises.

Someone who merely speaks out in favour of stricter asylum laws is by no means an extremist. However, it starts when someone makes a generalised negative assessment of foreigners (slackers, criminals, etc.). Then it is good to object and differentiate. When we talk to people with extreme views they might tell us conspiracy theories. Then we can try to steer the conversation by asking questions, e.g. about personal fears. If this is not possible, it is usually better to break off the conversation.

6

Debunk fake news

Extremist parties often successfully use fake news to spread their views; they reach young people in particular via social media. Debunking fake news must be a top priority in schools, above all other subjects! But parents, clubs and churches can also help to raise awareness.

In order to maintain the public's trust, the information must be comprehensive and honest. For example, it is quite true that the crime rate among refugees is somewhat higher than in the population as a whole. It is important that people understand the reasons for this:

  1. there is a high proportion of young men among refugees. There is a higher crime rate among young men in all sections of the population, including young native men.
  2. refugees often live in poor conditions, which also increases the crime rate.
  3. refugees have often experienced hatred and violence in their past (this is often the reason for fleeing). This also increases the tendency towards violence.

Nevertheless, the overwhelming majority of refugees are peaceful. It is important that criminality is consistently punished (see measure 2).

7

Explain democracy

Schools, clubs, churches, everyone must help to convey the principles of democracy to people and to recognize and expose extremist parties that want to undermine these principles (independent legislature, executive and judiciary, independent media and free elections).

8

Legal measures

Parties that demonstrably reject democracy should actually be banned. Anti-democratic positions have no place in politics, even if a significant proportion of the population holds such views. This is because these positions make decision-making in democratic parties (even) more complicated and offer right-wing extremists an advertising opportunity. It is good to talk to these people, but only outside the parliaments. However, we are now in a situation where in many countries such a party ban could strengthen or radicalise the right-wing extremist scene. Other legal steps may then be better, such as restricting party funding.

9

Strengthen order and security

When the crime rate rises, public sentiment tends to turn against immigrants and in favour of extremist parties (see also measure 7). When criminal offences are consistently prosecuted and people feel safe, they are less inclined to join extremist parties. Therefore, the police, state security, courts and authorities must be adequately staffed and excessive bureaucracy must be reduced.

...

Social equalisation, disaster relief, prosperity, environmental protection...

I know there are many more measures that can combat right-wing extremism. The more successfully politicians tackle problems, the less people tend to turn to extremist alternatives. But these efforts are not always successful and what succeeds is not enough to combat extremism. I see realistic potential in the above 9 measures to make progress in the fight against extremism.


Example Mechelen

Mechelen is a small town in Flanders (Belgium). It was once considered a run-down city with a high crime rate. Bart Somers became mayor there in 2001. His policies were an unusual combination of (right-wing conservative) law and order and (left-wing liberal) multiculturalism. The success was impressive: the satisfaction and cohesion of the inhabitants increased and crime fell enormously. The far-right party "Vlaams Belang" fell from 27% to 9% - even though the proportion of foreigners in Mechelen is very high! But 9% is not low for a party with extremist tendencies, and in polls from 2023 it even rose to 12%. This confirms my view that, in addition to a good integration policy, immigration must sometimes be limited.

Example Denmark

Denmark had a liberal refugee policy until 2001. Over time, however, the right-wing populist Danish People's Party gained strength. Although it did not come into government, it became so powerful that it was able to push through restrictive refugee laws. The democratic parties in Denmark adopted the right-wing populists' recipe for success: from 2001, they also advocated a restrictive refugee policy - with success; the right-wing populists lost influence dramatically.

Denmark shows that a restrictive refugee policy can push back far-right and right-wing populist parties. Nevertheless, I do not regard the Danish refugee policy as a role model: Their refugee policy was more radical than necessary and accompanied by a xenophobic language. This encourages far-right attitudes among the population. The better middle way: restrictive refugee laws only to the extent necessary to push back right-wing parties with extremist tendencies (at least below 10%), accompanied by foreign-friendly language!

Example church asylum

Church asylum means that churches temporarily take in refugees in order to protect them from deportation, which is considered life-threatening. In some cases, they have hindered the enforcement of state refugee laws. Nevertheless, I think that church asylums have actually helped in the fight against right-wing extremism. This is because they focussed people's attention on the individual fates of refugees and encouraged compassion for refugees. And they effectively protected refugees from life-threatening deportations.

What are the dangers of extremism?

A look at Putin, Trump and Hitler shows us the dangers:

  1. national egoism ("Make America great again"...) can lead to conflicts and wars
  2. neglect of climate and environmental protection
  3. loss of freedom of opinion, objectivity, spreading lies to maintain power
  4. arbitrary persecution and punishment
  5. corruption

Details: Deal with disasters

Why have extremist parties become so strong in this particular period?

  1. Social upheavals due to technological progress (internet, artificial intelligence...) cause fears; there are fewer secure jobs than before and the future is less predictable.
  2. The exchange of information via the internet enables more long-distance movements of refugees than in the past. People with foreign cultures increase fears, especially if they come from problematic backgrounds (poverty, persecution, war).
  3. The internet facilitates the spread of propaganda and fake news. It has become easier for extremists to reach many people. And those who want to defend democracy can't keep up.


Related links with view to some democracies

  • Germany: Measures of the Federal Ministry of the Interior - I see there parts of the mesures of this page, without measure 4 (Limit immigration) and some more. In Germany, the AfD is by far the most successful radical right-wing party. It is so successful that in some federal states it could be difficult to form a government without the AfD in future. It is therefore very important to combat it. I very much hope that the measures will be sufficient!
  • France: strict immigration law has been passed - the law should push back the far-right party National Rally with Marine Le Pen. Let's hope it works, because there is a risk that it will come into government in the future. Marine Le Pen as President of France - a disaster for Europe!
  • Spain: downward trend of the far-right Vox party - but in a Northern region it's involved in the government!
  • USA: Project 2025, an ultra-right-wing plan for Donad Trump - many see it as a plan to turn democracy into an autocracy or dictatorship.
  • Democracy indices - quantitative and comparative assessments of the state of democracy for different countries according to various definitions of democracy. The following map shows the results of the democracy index "Freedom of the world" for 2023:
2023 Freedom in the World

Free
Partly free
Not free
Not covered

Freedom in the world 2023 (More info)
© ProjectHorizons, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons

🧑‍🤝‍🧑👫🏽👫🏻👭🏽👬👬🏽👭🏻

Comments